saveelmer.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the saveelmer.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host saveelmer.com. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is Unified Layer .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called nginx/1.14.0 containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

pages links to state democratic party committees about categories daily main (5) archives january 2007 (4) december 2006 (1) calendar july 2018 m t w t f s s « jan       1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31   search recent posts the republicans are due on maple street the iraq war resolution, a look back – the democrats part iii the iraq war resolution, a look back – the democrats part ii… the iraq war resolution, a look back – the democrats part i… welcome to saveelmer – yes, another political blog meta log in valid xhtml xfn wordpress january 29th, 2007 the republicans are due on maple street by elmer there is a classic twilight zone episode called “ the monsters are due on maple street .” in it neighbors on maple st. witness the crashing of an object from outer space, a meteor, or more ominously, a flying saucer. the power goes out, leading to a belief “monsters,” aliens from another world, were about to invade their neighborhood. as they try to figure out what is happening, power is restored to selective homes, directing suspicion at those neighbors and accusations that perhaps they were in cahoots with these monsters. eventually paranoia runs so deep rioting and murder ensue, destroying the neighborhood and its inhabitants. at the end we see that aliens are simply manipulating the electricity to induce this paranoia, with the lessen being that it is easier to destroy a society from within, by getting neighbor to turn on neighbor, rather than through an attack from without. i was reminded of this episode last week when the “story” on barack obama’s alleged muslim training at a madrassa in indonesia broke. and the “revelation” that it was the clinton campaign that had investigated and exposed this fact to the world. the story was posted on insightmag.com, the online arm of the washington times, owned by the unification church of sung myung moon, was picked up by fox news, drudge, and the other usual sources of right wing propaganda. none of this was surprising. what did surprise me, and what got me thinking about the twilight zone episode, was the ease with which some in the liberal blogosphere picked up on this story and believed it on its face, immediately castigating the clinton campaign for the leak. the fact that it had been published by a source known not only for its inaccurate and biased reporting, but for its hostility to progressives and the democratic party, did not seem to phase those pushing it…even after it had been thoroughly debunked . and then again this week, drudge published a story about the size of john edwards new house in north carolina, implying that edwards was a hypocrite advocating for the elimination of poverty on one hand while building himself a palatial house on the other. again, this led to heated arguments among some on the left. and again, it didn’t seem to phase those pushing it that the source was drudge, or that john edwards had earned the money he used to build the home. in both of these cases we have a right wing news source planting a bogus or misleading story about one or more contenders for the democratic presidential nomination in 2008, which for a few days at least, got democrats attacking each other. i wonder if this is going to be the primary mode of republican attack this year. rather than the in your face confrontation that we have grown used too, will they use more subtle methods, plant stories which will set democrat against democrat, and try to get us to destroy ourselves, while they just sit back and chuckle… posted in daily main | no comments january 12th, 2007 the iraq war resolution, a look back – the democrats part iii by elmer note: in my first entry on this topic i talked a bit about the notion among liberal bloggers that george bush’s lies in regards to wmd’s were obvious at the time the iwr vote was taken. i specifically looked at the positions taken by william rivers pitt, first in 2005 in an editorial at truthout.org where he condemned the twentyeight democrats in the senate for their yes vote in favor of the iwr, followed by a look at his position one year earlier where he not only seemed to contradict his 2005 assertion that the book he authored stated unequivocally that there were no wmd’s in iraq, but seemed to indicate support for the iwr. i was able to ask mr. pitt about this in this thread at democratic underground. unfortunately his answer seemed to contain the same contradictions as his previous statements. in response to my query asking him about his 2004 position he replied as follows: i think the iwr vote would have been essentially benign… had bush not been in office. it is true that dealing with that regime required a big stick to weild, all the way back to clinton. all those bombs clinton dropped were done to force the continuation of the unscom inspections. look at this last war; hussen all but surrendered beforehand, because the threat was enough. the iwr opened the door for inspections under threat. had the inspections been allowed to be completed unmolested, the cause for war would have evaporated…and the inspections were only going to be allowed under threat, which was provided by the iwr. my opinion on this is based, in no small part, on my conversations with scott ritter. go back and read my book; he lays it all out, and has repeated same oftentimes. and yes, the senators should have known better. so he seems to acknowledge that the iwr was working until short circuited by president bush, but then in his last sentance says the senators should have known better. i wasn’t able to follow up to see exactly what he meant by this…but there it is. if you would like to read his book for yourself…it can be purchased here . on to the third installment on this topic… ********************** in 1952 arthur miller presented an excellent play called the crucible, a fictional work based on the 1692 salem witch trials (personal note: my 15th great grandmother, mary bradbury , was convicted but escaped punishment). as most probably know, a number of men and women in and around salem, massachusetts were accused by a group of mostly teenage girls, of being witches…that they had been willingly possessed by the devil and were performing evil acts as a result. the transcripts of these trials are fascinating and can be read verbatim here . in miller’s version, denial that one was possessed constituted evidence of guilt. in other words, confess to the crime of witchcraft even if you believed yourself innocent, and you were spared the noose. refuse to admit guilt…and you swung. the play’s central character john proctor, refused to sacrifice his honor and integrity by confessing to a crime he knew he did not commit…and he was eventually hanged for that stubborness. miller wrote the play as a commentary on the redbaiting of joseph mccarthy in his role as chairman of the senate permanent subcommitte on investigations. in mccarthy’s world, refusing to implicate others to the committee was considered evidence of communist affiliation. so, what you may ask does this have to do with the iraq war resolution and the twentyeight democratic senators that voted for it. well, since the iwr vote took place in october of 2002, and as a consequence of their support of that act, these twentyeight senators, particularly hillary clinton, have been labeled apostates to the progressive cause by many in the liberal blogosphere.it is now accepted wisdom that senator clinton and the other twentyseven democratic yes votes are warmongers , who have demonstrated a willingness to tolerate the death of thousands of american soldiers and many more thousands of iraqi civilians, for the sole purpose of advancing themselves politically. given that some even believe that these are the acts of war criminals, one would think that they would be unforgivable. and yet it seems one simple act is all it takes to escape the liberal political noose…all one

URL analysis for saveelmer.com

http://saveelmer.com/?p=3#comments
http://saveelmer.com/?m=200612
http://saveelmer.com/www.dlc.org
http://saveelmer.com/?p=9
http://saveelmer.com/?m=200701
http://saveelmer.com/?p=11#respond
http://saveelmer.com/?p=3
http://saveelmer.com/?page_id=4
http://saveelmer.com/?cat=2
http://saveelmer.com/?page_id=2
http://saveelmer.com/?p=5#comments
http://saveelmer.com/?p=11
http://saveelmer.com/?p=10
http://saveelmer.com/www.donkeydigest.com
http://saveelmer.com/?p=10#respond

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: SAVEELMER.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1648639132_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.fastdomain.com
Registrar URL: http://www.fastdomain.com
Updated Date: 2018-03-27T13:48:43Z
Creation Date: 2011-04-01T13:25:10Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2019-04-01T13:25:10Z
Registrar: FastDomain, Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 1154
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Name Server: NS1.BLUEHOST.COM
Name Server: NS2.BLUEHOST.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2018-07-06T01:34:39Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR FastDomain, Inc.

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =saveelmer.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME saveelmer.com

  CHANGED 2018-03-27

  CREATED 2011-04-01

STATUS
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited

NSERVER

  NS1.BLUEHOST.COM 162.159.24.80

  NS2.BLUEHOST.COM 162.159.25.175

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .